Main

July 09, 2007

Hey kids! Zuda comics!

So DC wants to get into online comics. That's spiffy.

The only thing is, does online comics need DC? Or does DC just need new talent to sift through? If they're serious about getting people interested in online comics, then where's the daily JLA strip to anchor things? Are they going to allow new creators to do new takes on the franchises?

I didn't think so.

Don't get me wrong, I think it's great that someone has stepped up and offered the chance of a page rate for webcomics creators. The question remains, how much of that webcomic will the creators actually own when all is said and done. At least when Epic relaunched, it explicitly said that "You shouldn't create something new for us and expect to hold onto it (PHANTOM JACK notwithstanding.)" And yes, it's great that they're open to genres besides superheroes (because superheroes really don't do all that well outside the fandom hothouse.)

Could this be something big? Sure. At the very least, it's DC acknowledging that there are other platforms (though they're still eyeing traditional publishing, else they wouldn't be ensuring that a set format be used for the submissions.) And maybe someone will get a new gig or two out of it. And maybe DC will learn something in the process.

July 08, 2007

I'll be back for you later.

deseretnews.com | Comics industry is here to stay

This needs to be examined. Hopefully this afternoon.

EDIT - By "this afternoon" I certainly meant "Saturday evening or Sunday before the kids get up."

Okay, got a little time to spend on this, so let's take a look. And when I'm talking comics industry here, I'm talking about Marvel and DC. There's some argument that things are considerably rosier for people who are putting out non-superhero genre books (in terms of being able to approach new book publishers, as opposed to monthly pamphlet publishers.)

It opens up with the intimation that the comics industry is dying, which DiDio immediately deflects by saying it's "transforming". Well, I suppose you could say that, but what exactly is it "transforming" into? Right now, you could argue that it's further turning towards franchise maintainence with attempts to update marquee characters and playing to a shrinking fanbase. When I look at sales charts, I see that big event books keep the other stuff afloat. That's quite possibly a jaundiced view, but it's my view nonetheless. Now, profits might be up in other places, like selling the toys based on the comics, and whatever money comes in from film versions of the characters, but I don't know all the numbers.

Point is, the big two are still trying to sell old characters in monthly comic books by way of a limited amount of retailers. I know a bunch of retailers, and they're all going out of their way to get readers wherever they can (the good ones, that is.) Even so, there's just not that many outlets for the bulk of comics sold. Yeah, that's gotten better with the success of graphic novels in bookstores (for which I'm thankful), but that itself has some effects on the Direct Market, just look up retailers who are competing with online sellers (and deep discounts). That'll become even more of a critical issue once publishers come to depend more on backlist sales (and even now, with the creation of instant backlist items once a miniseries or story arc has concluded.)

Next, DiDio goes on to say that collectability drives the market and makes single issues more viable in the long term than say, newspapers. If by "collectablility" he means, "motivation of the established fanbase" then he's probably on to something. Goodness knows that neither DC nor Marvel are really interested in bringing new readers into their mainstream lines. Superhero books (with some noble exceptions) are largely impervious to new readership, being a super-tuned product aimed at a very particular readership. This is a readership that can *afford* comics, knows *where* to get them, and is primed to *consume* them. But there doesn't seem to be much interest in a sustainable market in the monthly arena. Nor does there seem to be a ton of interest in making stuff that's accessable to new readers (the kids' lines of both the Big Two make some attempts at this, however, and that's to be commended -- now, get those digests in grocery stores and drugstores and skateboard shops and maybe we'd be talking.)

Then, DiDio "talks about COUNTDOWN." I suppose I should actually read it, but frankly, the world being laid out in 52 and the way in which it was being done just didn't do anything for me. I see no reason to hope for improvement in the second iteration. And of course "we're counting down to SOMETHING" gets slipped in. See, this has been the problem with most of the events from the Big Two, is that the SOMETHING is always being built up to but never delivered. Hard to make that stick when the whole point of superhero books is about the establishment and protection of a status quo. Again, exceptions apply, but by and large...they don't.

He also notes the importance of working ahead. Well yeah, editorial has to keep all them writers in line, right? But as smarter guys than me have pointed out, periods of heavyhanded editorial control always peter out and things swing back to a time of greater creative freedom. Eventually.

Oh yes, the joys of the Crying Superman. Because if Superman is crying, then you know that THINGS ARE PRETTY GODDAMN BAD, aren't they? Revel in superpowered schadenfreude. Their tears sustain the fans! CRY SUPERMAN, CRY! His tears are golden eggs from the goose that never needs die again (after all, that's been done.)

And DiDio also admits that sales are down, but he expects them to pick up. Has any maxi-series ever experienced such a sales trend? Maybe when some stuff actually *happens*, people will flock to it, but I seriously don't expect any new readers to be won because of the bold, new characterizations being undertaken in COUNTDOWN. But then I'm a notorius crank when it comes to these sorts of things.

Hmm. Somehow I expected to be more savage about this. Maybe next time...

July 04, 2007

Self-linkage on the 4th of July

Highway 62: It's a very, very Mad-Bomb.

Kirby's Captain America versus the Madbomb. How fitting for Independence Day. Of course, more fitting would be talking about any of the Kirby inventions that he got to benefit fully from (precious few, to be sure.) But nothing says the Fourth like Steve Rogers.

I'd say RIP and all, but this is comics, kids. We all know where it's going to end up.

June 18, 2007

The Death of Disposability

There’s a lot tied up in this, and it’s going to sprawl, shoggoth-like (shoggothic?) a bit over the landscape. Bear with me. It’s been awhile since I actually tried to order my thoughts on this sort of thing. And after that much time, you get lazy and flabby, gelatinous, even. You poke at your brain and it recoils like a… like a… thing, a thing that recoils from something hot.

Like I said, flabby.

So, like a lot of other people, I’ve jumped to conclusions about the sudden injection of Skrulls into the continuing melodrama that is the Marvel Universe. For those of you who don’t know, Skrulls are shapechanging plot devices (er, aliens) that can take the form of anyone or thing. Usually they end up taking the shape of a punching bag, though John Byrne, of all people, injected some menace into them (Fantastic Four annual somethingorother) as well as a sense of regal pathos (when Byrne had Galactus eat the Skrull Homeworld during his run on FF as well). Anyways, Skrulls are usually introduced to explain someone’s erratic behavior (“Hey, why is Power Man fighting Iron Fist anyways, I thought they were tight?”). And in a couple of years peppered with plot-hammering forcing characters to act in un-accustomed to manners, Marvel as a whole has to cut their readers some slack in our ability to prevent our eyes from rolling right out of our skulls. (Not that I’ve been following this stuff closely – sorry, Ed, but even you can’t make me read these tie-ins).

Continue reading "The Death of Disposability" »

April 18, 2007

Why Watchmen Works

Inspired by recent discussion, particularly over at Dirk's blog. (You know, Journalista!, which you're reading because he delivers the goods in an entertaining fashion on a daily basis.)

Why WATCHMEN works:

1) Story. Really, that's the be-all, end-all of this. Yes, there's issues with the ending. But you didn't care when you were reading it. You didn't care after the year long wait for the final issue. You wanted to see the story concluded, and it did in a way that wasn't particularly more improbable than Dr. Manhattan or Rorschach seeing out of his opaque mask.

Continue reading "Why Watchmen Works" »

February 23, 2007

And you’re acting so surprised.

Honestly. You people disappoint me. Really disappoint me. You all jump on the CIVIL WAR bandwagon, ride it to the end, bumps and all, and you all have the gall to act surprised when it turns out to be a flabby and unspectacular mess with all the dramatic tension of an episode of TELETUBBIES.

Here’s the fact. Giant, continuity-laden crossover event comics CAN NOT deliver emotional impact. I’m beginning to think that it’s a deficiency of the form, but the truth of it is that it’s a deficiency of the execution. I suppose if you handed the keys to Kurt Busiek or Grant Morrison or Matt Wagner or any other of the exceptional superhero writers, you could get it to work (assuming it wasn’t built as a tentpole event and just asked to do the work of a single story—no more, no less.) But not this time, and not in any of the examples in recent memory that I can think of. SEVEN SOLDIERS doesn’t really count, in my view, primarily because it wasn’t seen as THE BOLD NEW DIRECTION OF DC COMICS for the next year.

If you’re writing a story to sell a line to a frenzied fanbase, you’re starting from the wrong place. You’re trying to build a pyramid on a swamp. The foundation won’t hold and you’ll just end up driving all those slaves to their deaths for no good reason.

CIVIL WAR can’t be good. INFINITE CRISIS can’t be good. COUNTDOWN can’t be good. ZERO HOUR, INFINITY GAUNTLET, ATLANTIS ATTACKS, ONSLAUGHT and a bajillion other titles can’t be good because they’re all predicated on making the characters act out a story instead of having the characters drive a story. More to the point, the characters are all being made to drive an editorial fiat more than a story or even a mere plot. You all know this, down in the recesses of your hearts, but still you hope against hope and pick up the next issue of INFINITE CRISIS and pray that this is the issue where they turn it around and show that the people who put the book together UNDERSTAND the characters and what they stand for.

And, of course, inevitably, it never happens. The endings all read as “Huh, that’s it?” The characters perform baffling backflips of the psyche in order to serve the needs of the plot. The whole exercise comes off as hollow and interesting only in how it reflects the comics market as a whole or somesuch; hanging on the merest glimpse of a subtext to justify the reading of a (chronically late) comics series.

Granted, there’s exceptions. For all of its faults, CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS wasn’t hamstrung by these. All of its characters acted the way you’d expect them to, or if they didn’t, you didn’t end up scratching your head and saying “huh?” Is it good writing? Not particularly. Was is constructed in order to serve an editorial need, absolutely. But neither of those diminish its story qualities. Probably because it was the first of its kind and after that, there was an expectation of what these sorts of mini-series crossovers would MEAN and CHANGE in their respective comics universes. Not to mention the dreaded...relevance...that was apparently the aim of the last big miniseries to conclude.

And that’s where things went bad, wouldn’t you think?

So please, enough with the outrage over the conclusion of CIVIL WAR. It was bad. You knew it was going to be bad. It could not, by design, deliver what you were looking for. Okay, that’s done. Instead, go find something, ANYTHING, that does deliver what you’re looking for. And if CIVIL WAR did that, well then, I guess there’s just no help for it, is there?

January 05, 2007

Not. Constructive.

The following is a rant. Nothing more, nothing less. There are no great and unrevealed truths being offered, only a passionate restatement of what’s going down, dig?

Direct Market comic books are by and large, not written for children. They are written for adolescents of all ages, who seek a smattering of the titillations of maturity, but none of the weightier responsibilities that come with those. To shy away from that fact is kinda…willfully naïve at best. Younger kids as a primary market got forgotten a long time ago when a bunch of eggheads came up with the captive audience market that comics have been locking themselves into since the 1980s. Instead of husbanding a new generation of readers, nearly every single comic publisher has tried to maintain readership and not create new readers. As that market and that generation grew older, publishers continued to adultify their lines.

Sure, you could argue that process had been going on a long, long time (you ever see how Neal Adams drew Jean Grey in the 1960s?) But it was still a long way from that to WATCHMEN in the middle 80s. Of course, WATCHMEN wasn’t just famous for showing the Blue Beetle and Nightshade getting it on. WATCHMEN actually told a story, a real, genuine all-grown-up story (though relying on some genre tropes that may keep it out of the “Masterpiece” category for some time yet). The titillation was minimal, if nonexistent (but for where the character demanded it, the first Silk Spectre coming to mind there.) No fan-service in WATCHMEN. Not too much unmotivated endarkening going on.

Continue reading "Not. Constructive." »

November 15, 2006

A quandry

Okay, here’s my problem.

I moved from a city (well, suburb, really) where I used to have to drive about 25 minutes to get to a (by my standards) good comic store. This wasn’t a huge deal. I’d take some time, grab my son from school, get a double chili-cheeseburger and chili fries from Tommy’s and then hit the comic store. Which in this case was Comickaze (best of my choices for current comics in San Diego). Now, given circumstances, I couldn’t get out there every week. Sometimes I skipped two weeks in a row.

However, since I’ve moved, things have changed. A lot. El Dorado Hills, which is a (mostly) lovely community in the Sierra Foothills. Go to Folsom and you can get decent Mexican food, a little further and you can get Mediterranean, as well as Mongolian BBQ and the best hot dogs you’re likely to find in California. There’s used bookstores, a variety of useful and sometimes necessary commercial establishments. Not much culture to speak of, but whatever. In short, a decently-sized city. Go to Sacramento (about 30 mins, give or take) and you get into a good-sized city.

Now one thing I haven’t found yet is… You guessed it, a decent comic store. Granted, I haven’t had time to really prowl Sacramento (and really, it’s a bit far to have to drive just for comics.) However, even when I was in San Diego, I had to drive a significant distance, too. And San Diego is either the sixth or seventh largest city in the US.

Sure, you can get (a selection, sometimes a good one) of graphic novels/trades in most bookstores. Though those have their own pitfalls, and unless they’re serviced by someone who knows the field, it’s going to be a painful mess. Monthly comics, however, are all but gone from the big stores. And they don’t seem to have much of a street presence here. Like any. I know, I’ve already railed at the weaknesses of the floppy; I’ll refrain for now.

But it appears that the public (or the folks who sell to the public) isn’t all that interested in the format. Now, maybe Brian Hibbs is right and if we had a comic store on every corner (okay, I’m exaggerating), things would pick up. As it stands, comics are a niche market. Which is interesting, because according to most folks, we’re in the middle of a boom. Boom and niche don’t seem to mesh real well in my mind.

Anyways, unless I find a decent store within a half-hour driving distance, I’ll be forced to do one of two things:

1) Drive into San Francisco once a month or so (which may mean getting a pull list to make sure that I get the things that I want). Granted, this possibility has some appeal. SF is a great place to spend a day, and that’s not even counting the friends I have there. There’s three comic stores that I can think of off the top of my head that are likely to have most of if not everything I want.
2) Get a subscription at one of the shipping services like DCS. Which removes almost all of the human/geek contact out of the equation. And means I have to plan ahead of time. Which I’m not big on. I suppose this wouldn’t be so bad, but it’s not an exciting possibility for me.

It’d just be easier if a store opened. Preferably nearby. Wonder how many customers it takes to keep the doors open on a decent store…

November 13, 2006

Note to Reviewees

Blog - Note to reviewers: Stay away from Tokyopop.

No, I didn't substitute an 'r' for an 'e' accidentally up there. This is for the folks out there whose work is going to be reviewed, or those who think they might want to have their work reviewed in the future. Ready? Here goes.

1) What you intended doesn't matter. Your intentions for the work, while all fine and dandy during the formation of the work may not have anything to do with what people actually take out of the work. Conversely, reviewers who make personality judgements regarding the artist by way of their work are likely trafficking in horsefeathers and not any kind of reality. But, what you *meant* to say doesn't matter. You don't get to sit beside the reader and say "Okay, now here I was making a general statement about the nature of the father-son relationship and not about the fundamental injustices of the capitalist system as others have intimated." You don't have that privelege. The reader gets to jump to their conclusions on their own. Granted, those concusions may be ill-formed at best and highly reflective of the readers own prejudiced and experiences. And then they may go on to attribute those feeling to the work itself, rather than themselves. This may make them say things that you didn't intend (or support in the slightest). Deal.

2) You can't make people like your work. You can do your darnest (darnedest? -- someone help me out here) to make your work engaging and to tell the story that you want to tell (you *are* telling a story, right?). You can bend over backwards to fill your work with meaning (though that's dangerous -- see number 1 above). Once the work is out there, it's out there. No rewrites, no do-overs. It's done, move along.

3) Arguing with your critics (even worse, aguing *about* your critics in another forum, thus drawing even *mroe* attention to the "faulty" reading) is stupid in the most meaningful definition of the word. Did we not read #2 above? You *can't* make someone like your work. They like or they do not. Losing sleep over it or getting into heated debate about it (and spending energy *not* doing more work and actually growing as an artist) is a waste of resources.

4) Most criticism on the internet isn't worth bothering with (positive OR negative). This includes counter-criticism of criticism itself. Maybe. There are a handful of comics reviewers that I'll pay attention to (I'm looking at you, Jog; Ian, too) but you know what? I like plenty of stuff they loathe and vice versa. There's no arguing taste (see #2 above).

Of course, people are going to refute this and say "but what do you know, you're not a professional!" You're right, I'm not. But I try to conduct myself in at least a semi-professional manner. Griping at your critics and refusing to shut your trap is fruitless. If someone "didn't get" your masterpiece, well then you might consider how you might have obfuscated your thesis or betrayed your own intentions. Calling them out on it, however, is only going to make you look like an increasingly strident amateur (regardless of how many publications you have under your belt) and again, only bring more attention to the viewpoint that you want downplayed.

And there goes my blogging time for the day. Maybe I blog about comics tomorrow.

October 28, 2006

A warning

For those of you who think that you're creating for The Future and aiming at posterity and not the here and now.

Found over on Chris Allen's blog. It's a nice little bucket of icewater it is.

August 31, 2006

Preconception

I hear a lot, recently, about the "nobody likes a loser" phenomena. Generally, this is applied to folks discussing the top 300 books, and month to month trends. Someone will say "wow, FABULOUSMAN has dropped so many percent in the last few months."

Then people turn around and say "Don't say that! Don't point that out or you'll doom it!" Much like the run on banks sparked by a whisper about shrinking deposits, people will flock away from the banks (or books) in discussion simply because they look like losers.

The same is being said about books like DRAGON HEAD now, since Tokyopop announced the changes in its retail model. "People will stay away from the next volumes because they're set up to lose," say some folks.

People, some perspective. The only folks who follow these trends and this sort of publishing news represent only the tiniest fraction of comics/manga readers. Most people don't know or care about such minutae. They don't know that STUPENDOUSLAD is going to be cancelled until they see it on the stands: "BECAUSE YOU DEMANDED IT! LAST STUPENDOUS ISSUE!" Just because we are motivated to turn all the rocks over and get every scrap of information we can, doesn't mean that the general public thinks the same way. Books will come and go with nary a ripple and the rest of the world will carry on.

In brighter news, wasn't that latest issue of ALL-STAR SUPERMAN just fab gear? Someone please give Grant Morrison the keys to the kingdom already.

August 07, 2006

Evacuate!? In our moment of triumph?

Ah, Grand Moff Tarkin, you scamp.

Requiem for a rookie card. By Dave Jamieson

Lots of people have linked to this story in the last week or so, drawing eerie parallels between the rarified (and shrinking) worlds of baseball cards and comic books. How both went through something of a speculator explosion in the early 90s and then collapsed to significantly below previous market levels following that. How slabbed cards and slabbed comics have both tainted their respective industries. How the pursuit of holofoil over content left a bad taste in everyone's mouth and new fans never really took to either one after that.

And, sure, there's some truth to that. But one thing that most folks seem to have overlooked is that comics, at least nominally, are a particular storytelling media. Baseball cards aren't. Not even if you stretch box scores telling the story of a team's season over the course of hundreds of bubblegum-scented slabs of cardboard.

Sure, valuing comics and baseball cards as collector's items is a sucker's game. Well, perhaps that's too harsh, but it's certainly missing the point of comics, in that they're there to tell stories. Yeah, sure lots of those stories are threadbare plots with characters as unchanging as if they'd been in suspended animation for the last thirty years. But there's plenty that aren't. If you only value comics as collector's items, then you're surely dooming them to be nothing more than fetishes. And that's not sustainable for the business in the long run. Just ask the baseball card guys.

I'm not going to launch into an anti-alternate cover tirade here. I've said my piece on that. But even those manufactured scarcity items can't sustain a collector market beyond a small circle of the most highly obsessed. There might even be a market for servicing them, but I bet it won't be there in thirty years. Hell, I'm not sure there'll be a market for the most highly-sought after golden age material in thirty years. I dunno, maybe as a reaction to the digitization of comics, "real" comics will spike in value in the short-medium term, but once the generations that give a damn about paper versus pixels are gone, they'll be gone. It's not a renewable resource. Much like the dependence on sixty year old characters with no entry-level books unfettered by continuity or "mature" themes could do nothing but drive kids to manga (well, that and being primed for it by the last thirty plus years influx of anime and the adoption of anime techniques/aesthetics in western cartoons.

I'd even argue that the big companies insisting on treating their monthly books as serial chapters of larger works instead of as actual magazines is as much a hinderance as anything else. Lead with an acutal magazine, an anthology magazine of quality material that has diverse genre representation and then collect chapters into books and you might get some traction amongst people who don't read comics as it is. Though really, it's probably too late for that even. Digital comics portals, assuming they can get quality material (I know that diversity isn't an issue as webcomickers aren't wedded to superhero soap operas) and keep a steady stream going, and figure out a way to offset their own time/money costs, are here to stay. Even Joe Quesada thinks so. Scott McCloud has only been saying this for what, five years now?

It's a shame, because the companies like Image and Oni, the ones that are are putting out mainstream-reader friendly books that aren't locked into superheroes at any cost, don't seem to have enough of a presence outside the Direct Market to move books into the hands of new readers. And from what I can tell, most of the folks working on books put out by those companies (or a good chunk of them anyways) aren't able to make a living off of comics. By making a living, that means they can pay their bills and have enough time to create and still have time to self-promote. The companies themselves don't seem to have the resources to make alliances with other distributors outside Diamond (do you really think that Diamond would drop a company wholesale if they didn't sign an exclusive contract). Remember, when distributors to places like Amazon, Borders, Barnes and Noble, et al, obtain books, they're not doing it from the companies directly (as happens in traditional publishing). All those distributors have to buy direct from Diamond, even if they could perhaps work a better deal out by going direct to the publishers.

Sigh. Looks like I've gone far afield again. And here all I wanted to make was a simple point that comics don't equal baseball cards. Even if their markets have some relatively apalling surface similarities.

July 23, 2006

This year, you betcha

Ah, San Diego 2006. This was gonna be a big year, both for me and for comics overall. Just ask anyone from July, 2005 and they’d have told you that it was just over the hill. We were all so, what was the word? Optimistic. Yes, that’s it.

Lyrical interlude courtesy Radiohead:

Flies are buzzing around my head
Vultures circling the dead
Picking up every last crumb
The big fish eat the little ones
The big fish eat the little ones
Not my problem give me some

From the song “Optimistic” off of the sublime KID A.

Continue reading "This year, you betcha" »

July 17, 2006

San Diego

This is a semi-random, stream of consciousness sort of affair. Structuralists will be offended.

1) Please remember that nearly all residents of the city just want you to be a typical tourist: mouth shut, wallet open. Being a comic-related tourist is hardly an improvement. San Diego, as a city, only barely puts up with the comic convention as it is even though it brings a bajillion dollars to various hotels and gaslamp restaurants (and oh yeah, local sales tax.) Don't expect to be greeted with open arms unless you're covered in traveller's checks.

2) San Diego can be surprisingly warm, but it's the humidity that'll get ya. Granted, it's nothing like midwest or eastern seaboard humid, but locals will complain about how muggy it is as you reach for your hoodie. And if this year is anything like last year, you will want that hoodie for walking around the convention center (which is kept at meat locker-like temperatures.) You'll especially want it for walking around after dark, as the bay cools off significantly without benefit of sunlight. It will likely be overcast, but don't forget the sunscreen if you're going to spend much time outside. You will burn otherwise.

3) Food at the convention center is just absolutely dire. Dire. There's plenty of places that are about a ten minute walk away in the Gaslamp Quarter. Brave the elements and mass up, then cross those trolley tracks at the designated time and take in a nice alfresco lunch. As Tom Spurgeon has noted, San Diego does Persian food really well. Try Saddaf (4th and... geez, forgetting the cross street) and Bandar (better google it for the address) to get a good sample. Both have excellent lunch specials, though dinner fare is a little more pricey.

4) Remember, food *then* alcohol unless you have a designated bearer. In that case, go crazy, but make sure the digital cameras are safely away.

5) Bring water, though the drinking fountains are passable, even if they harbor...microorganisms. And on that tip, lots more folks seem to be bringing the Purell. I don't mess with that, as it's just breeding better bugs.

6) Do not park downtown. If you must park downtown, don't park near the Convention Center itself. Park far far away and take a trolley if you have to, unless you've got someone else to foot the bills. I park for free VERY FAR AWAY and take an eight-dollar roundtrip ride on the trolley, going over my pitches in my head. Okay, that last part is a lie. I generally ad-lib pitches, which explains how I got here.

7) If you're lurking around the Hyatt bar hoping to meet your favorite pro, good luck. You can't even hear yourself think in there. Soak in the ambience, but don't hope for an impromptu deal meeting.

8) What happens in San Diego will soon be all over the Internet. Remember that bit about digital cameras? I wasn't joking.

9) Comfortable shoes are a must. The Convention Center is bigger than that fold-out spread from ALL STAR BATMAN AND ROBIN THE BOY WONDER. You'll put on a lot of miles, so do your feet a favor and treat them with a modicum of respect. Unless, of course, you have a bearer or a palanquin of your very own, in which case, indulge.

10) I will offer no etiquette as to how to approach your favorite comics professional, other than to ask that you remember the golden rule. We're all just humans here. Treat others as you would like to be treated. Unless you're a masochist.

That's all that comes to mind. I'm sure there's a lot being left out, but you could probably find that from any of the other San Diego Preparation Checklists you'll see floating around the net this time of year.

July 12, 2006

Can't Disagree

Marvel.com - Blogs : Comics

So, does the cover matter anymore? Well, everything matters. It's just a question of degree. And at this point, the cover no longer has to shoulder the promotional weight that it once did--so it matters perhaps a little less than it once did.

Worth reading the whole article, (tip of the hat to Graeme over at Newsarama's blog for pointing it out). What I really find interesting in it is the admission that the comics market is closed, that comics are sold off of pre-orders and there's little or no effort to push beyond those boundaries to actually make any sales. I'd be the first to admit that covers aren't really going to sell to most folks in comic shops. They get the titles they get when they get them, following characters and not creators.

Granted Marvel's gotten better with branding their big event covers for easy recognition. But you kind of have to do that when you're depending on those tentpole crossovers for your continued existence. And story related covers aren't going to convince people to try THING, nor will the iconic covers scare people away from NEW AVENGERS/YOUNG AVENGERS, as Tom Breevort points out.

But that's in the DM. Where comics are sold as periodicals and trades are an afterthought. Do covers move books in the real world? Yes and no. A compelling cover will demand you to pick up the book and flip it over to read what it's about. You stick Greg Horn on the cover and it's going to look like a girlie mag (though he did clean up his act for the second volume of EMMA FROST, but probably too late to keep it from being shunned by its real audience--considering the emphasis was on gawky teen Emma and not zaftig Playmate Emma.)

I'm not going to refute any of Mr. Breevort's arguments, because I simply can't. In terms of the DM, he's spot-on. The cover matters when it comes time to get orders, but it's not going to change buying habits of most comics readers. But then maybe we should be shooting beyond the installed base, eh?

Remember, folks aren't going to read a book in public if they're embarassed about being attached to the cover that's parked under their nose. But then the inside has got to appeal as well, and frankly, most of Marvel's and DC's output doesn't have a readership beyond existing comics readers. Though they could, if they wanted to...

March 21, 2006

My big problem

With DC's One Year Later event.

It's reliance on cheap mystery to engage the reader. Want to know who the new Catwoman is and how Selina Kyle found herself in a delicate condition? Want to know how Superman lost his powers? Want to know why Green Arrow is in office?

Well then you want to read all of the One Year Later titles, don't you? Instead of simply having the stories progress naturally (or unnaturally, in some cases), we're thrown ahead in time, after a series of major upheavals, staring at a familiar world made unfamiliar. And the readers are desperate to know why. The emotional resonance comes not from the story itself: it comes from the reader who wants to know what has happened to his or her favorite characters. I always thought storytelling like this was a bit of a copout. And it happens a lot in comics, particularly in the "done in one" years. You'd get a great splash page of our hero in peril and the first thought balloon on the page is along the lines of "How the heck did I end up here?"

Of course, that's really the reader's thought, not the character's. That's where the dramatic tension comes from. Not from a story unfolding before you, but from the cheap thrill of instant peril that's never quite paid off.

Why does SEVEN SOLDIERS work and all this stuff is leaving me cold? Because SEVEN SOLDIERS is tight storytelling. Infinite Crisis/OYL is an event. SEVEN SOLDIERS happens before your eyes. The other stuff all takes place off the page, with mere plot pointers to direct you to the MEANINGFUL ACTION. But then I've had this problem with big event comics since...well...forever.

But hey, I'm just bitter because I'm not writing the BLUE DEVIL revival, right?

Right...

March 19, 2006

Wizard World LA

Short form:

Lame.

Medium form:

Relocating from Long Beach was a bad idea (nothing to do outside the convention center at all). Guest list didn't hold a lot of interest for me (all of their big names come to every west coast show anyways). Artist's Alley was half-deserted (there were still some standouts, but it seemed underpopulated). Programming was dire (unless you were a hardcore Marvel fan or hadn't been to Wondercon to get the same DCU panel three times). Costumes were largely unimaginative (though points to the Ghost Rider with the fluorescent orange wig). Spike TV's booth was unwelcome (even with all the comely lasses strategically placed inside, it was too big, too loud and too obnoxious. I know, that's their target demographic).

I finished with the place in a little over an hour, but stuck around a bit longer to rifle through the cheap OGN bins (plenty of Howard Chaykin goodness and a couple other oddities--including a copy of VOICE OF THE FIRE by Alan Moore for half off cover price, which I passed on). Said my hellos to people I came to see (that'd be Josh Fialkov -- Mr. Ritchie looked too busy most of the time to get a word in edgewise; Tommy Lee Edwards was a pleasure to chat with and his pages for BULLET POINTS look just great, though I'm not a fan of JMS, so I'm torn on this project.)

Wizard has a lot of work to do if they want to take over the west coast. Wondercon was three or four times the show that this was. Things that'd be nice to see:

More diverse programming (don't just focus on the big guys and their tentpole projects) would be welcome.

More diverse guest list as well.

More interesting events.

Some kind of incentives to get more local artists in on the show to make it feel like an LA show and not a generic and bland comic show (the art jam at the Golden Apple booth was great -- spread that out, make a bigger deal of it.)

Even the big guys didn't have their best foot forward (though the line for getting Geoff Johns to sign anything was a freakin' mile long). DC's booth seemed anemic compared to what they had up at Wondercon. Marvel's booth seemed kinda desultory, not a lot of effort in it. The biggest line there was for portfolio reviews.

On Saturday, the vendors were haggling hard for sales. I can only imagine what it was like Sunday.
Saturday morning, which should have been crazy busy (and was at Long Beach for the years I've gone) was dead. I was registered and in the door in ten minutes. Because the crowds just weren't there (although I was processed efficiently.)

Last year's show in Long Beach was much more impressive than this, and not just because I could go and get a reasonably priced Guiness and a meal afte crossing a street. Maybe it's the big two coasting on their big events, maybe it was Marvel shooting their wad early on Friday, and maybe it was just a not so good show this year. It happens.

Better luck next year, Wizard.

January 17, 2006

The Hegemony Will NOT be Televised

Globetechnology: Wired up, plugged in, zoned out

Courtesy The Beat comes the above story. I'll comment on some of it below (picking and choosing my battles carefully, much in reflection of the piece's thesis.)

Hey, that last part rhymes!

Anyways. Here's the main thesis, if you don't want to run through the whole thing. "Welcome to the new tribalism: Demarcations of faith and geography seem to be giving way to those of technology and taste."

I mean, that's basically it. The balkanization of culture, the defeat of hegemony. Seriously, it's why we'll never have another Beatles or Elvis or Stephen King or Star Wars. It used to be that distribution of cultural output was pretty tightly limited to those who had the resources to pull it off (ie, the big labels, the big TV networks, the big studios, the big publishers.) The number of cultural outletes was pretty tightly controlled (two radio bands, 13 VHF channels, a couple major newspapers per city, book publishers that sold into a handful of outlets.)

It's simply not the case any more, is it? We've got a million publishers, a million bands, a million independent movies going to DVD, a million podcasters plus a bunch of channels on Sirius and XM. All of these things compete for our attention and dollars. And you know what?

We're going to go after the stuff that we like (as a mess of individuals) and ignore the stuff that we don't. I know, it's shocking really. Cultural hegemony doesn't die with a whimper or a bang, but with the sound of a million million consumers (assuming they have the means to) ignoring the radio and turning on their iPods. Or they're not going to movie theatres and instead picking carefully from NetFlix selections. Maybe they're reading fiction published exclusively on the web.

At last, we're seeing democratization (or anarchy if you like) in action on a mass cultural level. Gee, I wonder who it's most upsetting to? Could it be that the cultural monoliths of our age, the Sonys and Foxes and Paramounts and RCAs are the ones most worried? Could it be the cultural gatekeepers and critics who have the most to lose?

Yeah, I thought so. I was wondering where the alarmist tone in the article was coming from. Took me a moment or two to suss it out. Right about here, where the author comes at the "enlightened individual" with the most severe threat they can muster: "Mr. Bugeja argues that through tribalism, we are actually sculpting ourselves into perfectly shaped and willing receptacles for marketers." It's like the joke about a million goths (or subculture of your choice) wanting to be individual in the least individual way.

By choosing, you open yourself up to being targeted by marketers who want to use your desire to culturally consume what you wish against you. Oh, teh phear!

You know what, if by listening to Neko Case albums, she makes money and wishes to record more albums that I may like, that's FINE by me. If more story-driven comics come about as a result of my favoring story-driven comics, then that's worthy of celebration.

I'll admit, there's the danger of being closed to new experiences once you put yourself in that cozy coccoon of whatever it is you like to the exclusion of all other things. But you know what, closemindedness is a danger even in the middle of mainstream culture. Choice isn't the enemy. Closemindedness is.

And funny, but I remember all these arguments being put forth when Walkmen were introduced. When rented videos were introduced. When chatrooms were big. When the World Wide Web made its debut. When Napster was running at full power. When blogs first appeared. Old argument, folks. Its the thesis meeting the antithesis in anticipation of the synthesis. Same 'ol, same 'ol.

Doing the solicit thing - DC

I haven't done this in awhile, so why the heck not? Now, I'm not going to be going through title by title. No way. I'll pick on things worthy of note from my own little corner of the peanut gallery. Shall we?

I love how ALL STAR BATMAN is the first book solicited, as if to remind everyone "Oh yeah, Miller and Lee inna house at DC! Raise tha roof y'alls!" I make no apologies for this book. It's SIN CITY Batman with color art, with all that implies: hilarious and grim, unapologetic and exploitative.

MAN-BAT might be interesting, though. However, the Simone Bianci by way of Alex Ross covers for some of the other batbooks are throwing me off. I liked Bianci's art just fine on SHINING KNIGHT, but these covers aren't doing it for me.

Of course I'll be there for BATMAN YEAR ONE HUNDRED by Paul Pope. It's about the only batbook I'm actively looking forward to.

Why is Superman not appearing in costume on any of the covers of his books? I'm sure there's a Very Good Reason that we'll have to read all the One Year Later books to find out. I'm curious, but nowhere near that curious.

I'm really curious how Chuchill and Rucka will go together on the new SUPERGIRL book. No, I'm not interested in reading it all, but curious how the nipples through the t-shirt on anorexia victim artist and heavily character-driven (particularly with women) writer will get along. Doesn't seem like a match made in heaven, really.

Hey look, an affordable paperback for a premiere Superman storyline with Jim Lee art that came out over a year ago. You'd think that DC doesn't want to sell cheap paperbacks...

And the Simone/Byrne ACTION run gets its trade collection finally. I realize that this is largely a heretical opinion, but I liked Byrne's MAN OF STEEL revamp. Sure, there were missteps and decisions that I didn't agree with (or particularly care about at the time), but his portrayal of Superman was one of the best of modern times. It was nice to see him on the title again with intelligent and sparkling writing behind it. That said, I have the floppies and know where to read 'em again, but the trade is worth looking into for folks who want a fun Superman book (even when it was being boxed into a larger ongoing crossover).

Hey look! INFINITE CRISIS comes to an end! And bad things happen to Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman! Oh noes!

Hmm. VILLAINS UNITED gets a one shot. Liked the series, but did I like it *that* much?

CHECKMATE gets the longest solicit blurb of any book, and I'm still not interested. The human toll on the valiant agents of Checkmate just doesn't compel. GOTHAM CENTRAL made that into its meat and bread, but I'm not feeling it with this offering.

We'll see how HAWKGIRL pans out. On paper, it sounds like it can't lose. Hopefully they'll keep the team of Simonson/Chaykin together long enough to get some real momentum behind the book.

HARD TIME will be on my pull list as always. The second issue of this run stepped up things nicely after a first issue that was largely flashbacks and getting new readers up to speed.

A HAUNTED TANK showcase volume? Yeep.

JONAH HEX #6 - Nuns with guns! I think I'm signed up just on the basis of this tagline.

SOLO #10 - Damion Scott? Should I know that name? Can't see picking this up.

SEVEN SOLDIERS #1. Yes.

SGT. ROCK: THE PROPHECY. Yes, please.

THUNDERBOLT JAXON from Wildstorm. What the heck is this? Have I missed talk of fantastic heroes facing off against Elder Gods? Was I asleep?

AMERICAN VIRGIN #2. We'll see how #1 goes down. Becky Cloonan is hard to beat.

DMZ #6 depends on how the second story arc plays out. #3 was solid, but I suppose I could get hit by a cosmic ray and decide that I need to save that three bucks a month and go trades instead or something.

EXTERMINATORS #4 is kinda in the same boat. I like Tony Moore's art a great deal, and the dialogue is authentic enough, but the last couple pages of #1 give me pause.

LOVELESS gets one of the fastest trade collections I've ever seen from DC (only the Infinite Crisis leadins were faster.) I guess they're looking for a big response in the bookstore market. It might be a smart move. The single issues are just not moving the story along fast enough, engaging as it is. Besides, this is a book that could have much broader appeal, with the right format. Most people don't want just a chapter at a time. They really don't.

New SANDMAN MYSTERY THEATRE collection makes me happy.

New SWAMP THING makes me happy, too.

TESTAMENT is in the same boat as the other new Vertigo books. Good, but I'm not getting blown away like I'd like to be. Perhaps my standards are too high. I'll finish out the story arc and see how it comes together, though. I reserve the right to be pleasantly surprised.

A good couple of Heck Yeah's! in there, so that's nice. Better than a usual month, it seems...

January 11, 2006

Further Chronometric Adventures!

The magic of time travel brings you the resurrected Full Bleed, my column for Broken Frontier that ran from 2003-2004. It ended right about the time I started up Highway 62 over at Blogspot, so things dovetail together nicely. Some sorta interesting stuff, a lot of dated stuff, and a lot where you just swap out the names and it all works just fine today. Search for the tag "Full Bleed" on this here blog to see any of the old ones. I may index it and hardlink that sometime, too, but it's enough to just get these old things back on the net for now.

More like falling

Ian asks, in the above link, a question of all the lapsed comics readers who came back to the fold. "What brought you back?"

Well, that's easy in my case. Grant Morrison. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

Continue reading "More like falling" »

January 04, 2006

Why don't you *listen*?

Permanent Damage at CBR

The above is not a permalink. I know, I often link over to Steven Grant's Permanent Damage, but it's generally for a good reason. This is the case today. As the current zeitgeist in the comics air seems to smell markedly of "Holy Crap!"-ness, and people are getting twisted knickers about mainstreaming comics (see today's BEAT for that one, true believers), folks are giving serious thought to exactly where we're sitting.

I mean, take a look at what Brian Hibbs has to say about 2006. Scroll down a bit. It's not cheery. But it shouldn't be cheery. We're working (well, I'm *trying* to, anyways) in an industry that's largely beholden to a single distributor who's primarily interested in servicing its two biggest clients, who usually work with a single printer and said printer has minimum print runs that have to be met, and oh yes, we're selling our wares in a single market that's tough for some people to get to. Maybe you see where I'm going with this. The eggs are in one basket, and we're walking around in early January, when the ground is at its most slippery.

Anyways, Steven has some firm admonitions that folks might want to pay attention to. This series is my current favorite:


Most independent publishers, excluding self-publishers, break down into two groups: those that want to be Marvel or DC, and those that don't want to be Marvel or DC. The former group are the ones who've bought into the myth that market presence=market success, and the way to achieve market presence is to put out a lot of different comics. The latter group are the ones who base their publishing decisions on what Marvel or DC wouldn't do. Virtually no independent publisher projects a viable independent self-image, nor do many demonstrate a coherent game plan with their publishing. Market presence doesn't mean pumping out a lot of books, especially when most of those books are half-assed, derivative or empty. It means projecting an identity that suggests dependability to customers. The right kind of dependability.

I know, because I'm following the business pretty regularly, the sorts of things that Image stands for (most of the time--they still sometimes chuck a curveball my way), but it's difficult for me to actually articulate it. I've a far better idea of what AiT/Planet Lar does: "HBO on paper," comes to mind, and I think that's a quote. What about a company like Claypool? What about Speakeasy? Oni? Even Dark Horse to a degree suffers from this.

I defy you to wave an IDW and a Dark Horse book at a non-comics reader (or even their entire lines) and have them spot a difference (other than the cover price.) Both depend on licensed titles as their backbones to keep a steady stream of cash supporting their other, more diverse works. And I'm not saying this is a bad thing. Quite the opposite: it's eminently sensible, assuming it's actually working.

But aside from the logos and the price points, what's the difference? What does one do that the other doesn't?

Yes, as comics readers, we know that "Image isn't the Big Two" and that's their primary difference to readers. To creators, the differences run *a lot* deeper, that being the difference between owning what you work on and just cashing a steady check. But to the casual comics reader, exactly what's the difference? I mean, other than the colors of spandex being displayed, what's the difference between Marvel and DC? Most folks wouldn't know. Or care.

Anyways, give the column a read. Yes, a lot of the ground has been covered before, but sometimes you have to walk on the bridge a couple of times before you realize exactly how rickety it is, and how much those pilings need to be shored up. Or that you need another bridge.

December 31, 2005

2006

We sail tonight for Singapore,
We're all as mad as hatters here.

Courtesy Tom Waits and his singular album Rain Dogs, which I always find myself fishing out this time of year, prodded by the featureless gray sky and insistent drizzle of the season. Yes, there is a rainy season in Southern California. That's how you can tell it's not summer.

Not that this was a terrible year, by any stretch, but it was a frustrating one. Top of the list of the reasons for it would be the inability to get Strangeways out of the gates this year. And really, I can talk about how the publisher got jerked around by Lamppost printing or Quebecor being impacted at the end of the year, but those are just facts. My gut tells me that I should have gotten the job done myself. Of course my gut tells me dumb things like "that second chili burger ain't gonna hurt" when I know that's simply not the case. All the same, if you'd asked me in spring, I'd have said that it was a no-brainer that the book would be on the stands. And that bites, really.

But it was frustrating for a couple other reasons. One of those would be the damning conservatism on the part of the Big Two in comics. Don't get me wrong, books they put out probably tote up to about half of the comics work that I read this year. And they've put out some good books, even some good superhero books, which is something of a surprise, given that I'm not real fond of most superhero books these days. But for every nod I tossed their way, there was at least one grimace at their behavior as well. I could name them all, but you know what I'm going to say. And ultimately, all the dumb things I got mad at were things that were meant to serve one purpose: to retain their control of a shrinking readership.

I've seen very little on the part of either Marvel or DC to actually do anything resembling market expansion. There was that story about Marvel trying to get back into 7-11 stores, but I don't recall hearing any sort of follow-ons as to whether or not it was succeeding, and if it had done anything to expand their numbers or get more eyeballs rolling towards traditional comic pamphlets. DC is in the same boat. Sure, they get press coverage for the "risky" moves taken by INFINITE CRISIS and the follow-on series(es) to come (and I've already talked about why they aren't risky moves at all, at least with regards to the audience as it stands).

Both of them are too wedded to the form that they've perfected and that retailers are primed to sell. That being the 32 page pamphlet at the three dollar price point (four dollars for IDW's books, though they're no more expensive to produce than the typical Marvel/DC book, and probably a lot less when it comes to paying the talent). Not only that, but this story chunklet (and let's admit it, it's rare that you get a satisfying chunk of story in 22 pages plus cover and ads of a standard western-format comic) is only available in a few stores. Sure, if you're in a major metropolitan region, you've got a good chance of having more than one comic store within your stomping grounds, but not everyone is.

I live in San Diego, the sixth-largest city in the US. You know how far I have to drive to get my comics? Twenty-five minutes to get to a good store. Twenty to get to a crummy mall store that doesn't stock outside the big two. I go because this is the only way to get my fix. God help anyone who lives in a truly suburban/rural region and is a comics fan and wants to browse the books before they buy. Yeah, there's DCBS, but with them you're depending on Previews being on the money and giving you enough of a taste to get excited about the books to put your money down.

People say that comics wither on the vine because of the exaggerated presence of superhero comics. I say that's a strawman. There's plenty of genre diversity in comics, though I'll admit that you have to go digging for it, and get out of the top 200 books. Sure, I'd be happy if there was more, but there's enough to sustain a wider audience. It's not the content that people are objecting to. It's the form that causes a problem (both in actual form and the outlets selling that form.) Twenty-two pages of comics will very rarely come off as a satisfactory chunk, much more so to "civilians" than to people who are used to getting their stories in serial chapters. That makes comics seem expensive to most readers. Add to that the fact that you can only get comics dependably in a (comparatively) few outlets (as opposed to say, music stores or DVD stores, etc.), and you've got a bunch of strikes against wider adoption of the form.

But hey, it's what folks are used to, right? Ain't inertia grand?

And of course, you're going to turn around and say "well, what have you done about it, smart guy?" And I'd have to admit, "not a darn thing." Realistically, the audience for the single issues of Strangeways begins and ends with the Direct Market. When there's a collection to offer, giving an entire story (and then some), you can be sure I'll be beating the bushes of Western Bookstores and book clubs and horror bookstores and book clubs, ISBN in hand and drawing attention to myself. But for the monthly pamphlet, the market is much, much smaller. And far more temporary. Trades aren't the whole answer, but I bet you can get a lot more interest and sense of apparent value from a trade collection that you have to go the store once to buy, as opposed to six serial trips to the comic store that might be aroud the corner (or half an hour away).

You know what I want to see in 2006? Original graphic works offered for a reasonable softcover price (and yes, there's publishers who do this already). I'd really love it if they stopped publishing, for instance, Superman in singles and went to a spined magazine format that gave solid value and gave you long stories that you could read in longer than half an hour. I'd love it if there were more crime books that were something other than wallowing in the depravity of the week. I'd love to see cover design and trade dress that didn't make comics look like comics (and yes, this is being done, but not by publishers with the clout to make the practice expand.)

Of course, I'd be down with comics being published with every intention of them being permanent works and not just another placeholder or 1/6th of a future trade collection. Sure, there's lots of works that have bloomed out of the manure pile we often refer to as pop culture (guys like Dickens and Chandler come to mind). The editors had so many pages to push out, and sometimes geniune diamonds rained from the sky to ornament the banquet of mud that most of them put out on a regular basis, but still, it'd be nice to have an eye to the future illuminating the work of the present.

I'd like to come to the end of 2006 and not feel so damn maudlin about the industry, and certainly my work within it. Sometimes it feels like all I've done is grumble, and that's likely true when talking about 2005. Hell, it feels like the only writing I've actually done this year is online, which often amounts to bellyaching. And that's not the way I want to be looking down the sights at 2007. Need to get more actual writing done, though sometimes that's hard to justify when you're looking at projects that only work as 12-issue limited series and you're having trouble getting that 4-issue cowboys and werewolves story close enough to the edge to give it a swift kick and send it flying.

Why is it that I have time to bellyache (and it comes so naturally), and I've had precious little time to actually celebrate the good stuff that I've read this year? Perhaps I'm just a grumpy old man after all. My white hairs would back me up on that one.

Ah well. May 2006 be a little less rocky than 2005. Or at least let it present some kind of sense of achievement and closure, and maybe just maybe, a little triumph, to us all.

December 18, 2005

Uh... Just, "uh..."

--Black and white comics. Only the clean, pure lines of manga can still do this. It's getting increasingly hard for anything that isn't manga to go into print without color.

From the latest issue of the Park and Barb show.

I'm grumpy and not gonna let this one ride. Manga is not, repeat, is not, the only comic art form that is pure and clean. Nor is it the only form that looks good in black and white. Any good artist can make their black and white work shine. Period. Cameron Stewart comes to mind, but maybe that's because I have those SEAGUY pages not far out of my eye line.

I will say that there are plenty of artists whose work doesn't stand up in black and white, but that's because they're drawing for the book to be colored.

But to intimate an inherent superiority in a particular expression of comic art does more to reflect writerly biases than it does to speak commandingly on the form. My two cents, y'know.

And why is it that when people talk glowingly about manga and how it's openly embraced by a new generation of kids that are ignoring western comics, that they always always seem to skip over the fact that this is the culmination of a thirty year process of Japanese pop culture importation? Audiences have been primed to respond to this by way of everything from BATTLE OF THE PLANETS and ULTRAMAN in the 70s to the POKÉMON and POWER RANGERS explosion of the last ten. Putting JUSTICE LEAGUE on for a half hour in an adult timeslot does nothing when compared to large blocs of imported cartoon programming.

Sorry, but this really yanks my chain. Probably because I'm one of those retrograde idiots putting out black and white work these days. Manga succeeds as much on the back of its form and presentation, as well as its content as well as its "familiar yet alien" status as well as being the new thing. There's plenty of excellent craftmanship in manga that uses linework that's clean (Junji Ito's work comes to mind), but there's plenty that's rough hewn and just as beatiful (LONE WOLF AND CUB, anyone?).

There's a few other bones I've got to pick with the article, but this one was just glaringly daring me to point it out. There's also some good points, but I'm afraid they get obscured.

Well, there's this one:

-- How can you say comics are in trouble when creators at imprints such as Ronin (to name just ONE company that's like this) are PAYING, up front, to get their comics into print?

Oh, that's easy. That model isn't sustainable unless the market that they're selling to responds and snaps up those comics. I realize this, of course, because I'm smack in the middle of it (or at least on the outskirts). The above model is a gamble. On a good day. On a bad day, it's an invitation to disaster. Moneywise anyways. There's all the satisfaction of finishing a comic, sure, but that's not going to get the kids baloney sandwiches and pay for the hot water.

Passion and enthusiasm are one thing, and they're admirable, but they're not all that you need to keep a thing going in DM-oriented comics today. Besides, pay-to-play didn't last forever on the Sunset Strip (remember hair metal, kids?) and it's not going to be ano option in comics should there be a downtick or three in the market. Image seems to be solid, but there's plenty of other publishers working that seam who aren't as steady.

As for his assertion that comics are going to change from where they've been in the last five years. Sure, they are. But the majors are going to change as little as possible and still keep their audiences. They're doing nothing to expand readership. They've been circling the wagons since 2003, and before that. Other folks have a real opportunity to succeed, but not on that particular chunk of DM turf. It's too well-secured, too well-protected.

And please, don't take this for malice on my part. I've met Park and Barb. They're smart, witty and passionate folks, who I don't always agree with. But if the world were like that, it'd be deadly dull.

December 13, 2005

Of further note

Thanks to The Beat and Graeme at Savage Critic for linking back to this here humble blog. I'm sure that it'll account for more traffic than I likely deserve.

It's clear from the comments below that I managed to obscure my more important point with a far less important assumption (that people have gravitated towards commenting on), rather than the meatier matter at hand. I assumed that if issues 3 and 4 of a under-ordered miniseries were available online that 1 and 2 eventually would be, and that customers would merely wait for all of it to show up online so that they could read it for free. That may indeed be a mistake on my part. I'll own up to that.

That said, it's a minor point. The real point is that using Direct Market sales to lead to online reading seems like putting the cart before the horse. Yes, yes, we're living in a time of paradigm shifts and all that. Online comics are the future, etc. But we're not all strapped into our personal jetpacks just yet, are we? We've still got at least one foot in the DM, if not one and a half (or one and four toes and the heel). American (even Canadian companies) haven't yet figured out how to monetize large-scale books.

Oh yes, I'm in it for the money. If that ruins your dreams of my aesthetic purity, so sorry. Luis and his studiomates need to be paid, and they are paid within two weeks of me getting the finished pages. Postage doesn't grow on trees, nor do xeroxes of preview materials to be sent out to retailers. In fact, I'm the only one who hasn't been paid at this point. Not a complaint. A fact.

My problem with this plan is it's basically leading readers out of the DM, which is where Speakeasy is supposed to be making its money currently. No, the DM isn't a perfect thing. However, the folks who are operating in the DM aren't going to embrace migration with open arms. Particularly when they're the ones selling the books in the first place. My problem with this plan (as it appears, right now) is that serialized books from Speakeasy will receive diminishing support *in their primary market.* The DM as it stands isn't eternal. There's already been a siginificant amount of change in the past several years (consolidation of publisher hold on the top titles, the rise of trade paperbacks, general shrinkage of circulation for books outside the big 2).

I'm not the biggest fan of serial fiction, but there's a number of economic realities and audience expectations that keep the serial form at the top of the heap in the DM. This calls for a steady stream of resources, rather than the all-at-once costs associated with doing a singular, larger work. It also asks less money of the consumer, at least in the short term and means only a small investment on their part to get a taste of the work.

It also introduces all kinds of restriction in terms of pacing/structure. You can work around them, but there's only so many ways to dance around the 22 page chunk format. But I'm getting far afield here.

The market accepts trades because it gives the customers something else, a different format for those who prefer to get the whole story in one sitting, everybody wins. Sometimes the singles lead to customers buying the trades, and even if that's the case, the DM retailer gets to keep the customer. But if the note in the back of issue #2 reads "Go read the thrilling conclusion online for free", then that trail doesn't lead back to the DM at all. In fact, there's no money in it, unless you're selling banner ads.

Not yet, anyways. And who knows, maybe there's a brilliant plan to make it work. But right now, that's not evident to me.

Hope to Cthulhu that this entry is clearer than the last on the subject. And please, don't think that I'm anti-internet distribution. It's the next great thing (in terms of cost vs. audience), once people can figure out how to exchange goods for payment and keep pirates from stealing everyone's content and publishing it for free (or worse, taking the money for themselves.) The whole NYC2123 project (detailed below) has opened my eyes to a completely different form (as has talking to a guy who's writing scripts for handheld games and trying to tell stories in screens rather than pages). This clearly bears further investigation, but what I'm hearing right now about jumping from print to nebulous internet delivery isn't lighting my fires just yet.

December 07, 2005

Good grief.

HALF LIFE - Millarworld.tv Forums

Okay, I knew Sean Phillips was good, but the cover of this just knocked me out. It's his self-published collection of life drawings, out through Cafepress. Why he isn't getting regular cover work from either of the big two (much less his interiors, which show a range of emotions that most artists could only dream of) is beyond me. Oh that's right, it's because folks want cleanly over-rendered and over-muscled figures in static and boring breakdowns. Silly me.

Though I have to admit, as much as I love Phillips' work, I'm going to be hard pressed to even pick up and flip through the MARVEL ZOMBIES book due out today. Just doesn't seem appealing, but I could be won over by the art, and it could be a light week.

December 05, 2005

Silly territories

PeterDavid.net: Claypool problems

My reply as follows:

Okay...now we're just into silly territory. I mean, are people SO locked into monthly comics that they're literally *incapable* of making trade collections available when the content is most likely a previously sunk cost and provides a better return per unit than the singles? (This assuming that 1/3 of the audience would exist for a book that returns 5x as much).

I just don't get this. When I was a kid, comics cost bupkis. They were disposable and almost always offered massive story bang for the buck. Now comics cost a ton of money and try to pass themselves off as eternal objects with ISBNs, yet don't have spines and don't take to bookshelving real well. Gee, why is it that manga collections have taken over bookstore shelves with their fat spines that has artwork and numbering on them? What's up with that? Why is it that monthly comics are largely written as chapbooks and creators get all agitated when we want more story and in fact wish to wait for all of the story at a single sitting and want a more permanent object that we can come back to?

So, what's the current paradigm? Not only must trades not be available, but you must whine incessantly when readers don't rush out every Wednesday to pick up the latest chunk of an ongoing story? Monthlies or nothing. I mean, that's what's being said here. Here's a company that's teetering on the brink, and yet refuses to change the way they do things to possibly expand their audience or present themselves to an entirely new audience, but if you can't put out the monthlies like you always did, you're not interested. Being readily available in any format isn't sufficient. They have to be readily available in a saddle-stitched format. Why? To keep doing things as they've always been done?

if it means that much to you, refuse to adapt to a changing marketplace and get left behind.

And should Mr. David read this, please know that I enjoyed your run on The Hulk all those years ago, and that the above is probably more spiteful than necessary, but some things need to be said.

As for the "waiting on the Spanish hand-binding." Please. You want us to pay the per copy price that's unreasonably high in many cases, and then pay twenty bucks a volume on top of that (or significantly more) to bind them? Don't let's be silly now. If there's a change in your customer base and its desires, then perhaps it'd be more constructive to respond to those instead of whining about how things were better in the old days.

Comics have an extremely limited market/audience when written exclusive as habitual serial fiction. Not everyone wants to go to a comic store (even a cool one) every Wednesday to pick up the latest chapter of a story that started six months ago or more. Sometimes they'd like to have it all at a single go. By and large, people don't buy chapters of novels as they go. If you want to deliver novel/movie scale entertainment, then you have to follow some rules. The laws of the universe dictate that you can't put 120 story minute equivalents into 22 pages, and if you do it in 22 page chunks, then you sacrifice a lot in terms of pacing. If you want readers to come back to the next chapter out of desire to get more of the story and not out of habitual attachment to the franchise character, then make the single chapters satisfying on their own. It can be done, but it's not the norm in this business. Not by a long shot.

Find a new way to do things, because the old way ain't gonna work forever. Hell, it might even already be not working so great unless you've got sixty years of characters to lean on.